Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison in microphone vs. mobile mismatched conditions using Japanese /ai/

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper describes a likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison experiment in microphone versus mobile channel mismatched conditions using parametric representations of formant trajectories. Cubic polynomial coefficients of /ai/ from non-contemporaneous recordings of 30 Japanese male speakers are used to derive multivariate likelihood ratios. The results are evaluated separately for a matched and mismatched group to determine the effect of the mismatch on system performance. A calibrated cross-validated log-likelihood ratio cost (Cllr) of 0.93 is achieved for the F-pattern of /ai/ representing an 18% reduction in system validity relative to the matched group. Separate testing involving only F1 and F2 features evinces a smaller (10%) reduction; suggesting F3 may be more impacted by channel differences. Spectral analysis of F3 indicates this stems from formant tracking errors due to weak signal energy in transmission. As such, F3 in /ai/ should be excluded from analysis where it is poorly preserved. Given the relatively small percentage reductions in validity, it is concluded that /ai/ may be reasonably robust to the mismatch. However, poor performance in optimal conditions (Cllr = 0.77) suggests it may not be a particularly useful parameter in the first place. Limitations to the current study are also discussed.

Description

Citation

Source

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until