More on Contingency Table Analysis, Decision Making Criteria, and the Use of Log Linear Models

Clark, G. A.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

More on Contingency Table Analysis, Decision Making Criteria, and the Use of Log Linear Models

Date

1976-07-01

Authors

Clark, G. A.

Abstract

Read's (1974) discussion of contingency table analysis is amplified. Procedures for model formulation and testing advocated by Fienberg (1970) and Goodman (1968, 1969, 1970) are outlined, contrasted, and used to analyze a corpus of archaeological data. It is argued that Fienberg's approach is better suited to situations in which the behavior of the data can be accurately predicted within fairly narrow limits. The Goodman approach is more appropriate to situations in which the behavior of the data is completely unknown.

URI

https://dspace-test.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/733726908

Collections

DevOps Pure Testing

Source

American Antiquity

Type

Article

DOI

10.2307/279515

Full item page

Cultural advice

More on Contingency Table Analysis, Decision Making Criteria, and the Use of Log Linear Models

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Description

Keywords

Citation

URI

Collections

Source

Type

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until