Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Knowledge co-production praxis in sustainability science

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Knowledge co-production is needed as never before to support social change in the face of climate, water, biodiversity, and other sustainability crises. Co-production brings together diverse groups and their ways of knowing to generate new knowledges and practices that reconfigure or generate transformative social changes and that invite reflexivity. Within sustainability sciences, tensions exist between descriptive, analytical framings of co-production used to interrogate knowledge-power relations and instrumental or normative framings used to build such relations. The former has been criticised for being overly descriptive and difficult to translate into policy outcomes and the latter for failing to sufficiently interrogate power dynamics and for perpetuating existing inequities. As researchers, how are we to navigate this tension? Co-production praxis involves reconfiguring knowledge-power relations for just and transformative social changes. I suggest what is needed is a critical lens on those relations to underpin and guide feasible and action-oriented processes and outcomes for such changes. In three ways, I present and reflect on co-production contexts with different temporal, spatial and epistemological characteristics. These contexts are analysing historical co-production of knowledge of coastal freshwater floodplain Country of the Northern Territory, facilitating the Kunwinjku Seasons calendar and enabling reflexive co-production praxis with sustainability science researchers at a national science institution. I demonstrate the need within each context to weave analytical, practical, and reflexive work to reconfigure fairer societal outcomes and to pay greater attention to socio-institutional changes arising from our engaged work.

Description

Citation

Source

Geographical Research

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until