Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Can second-order stimuli generate simultaneous motion contrast?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Purpose. To test whether second-order motion stimuli can induce simultaneous motion contrast; in which a target grating is perceived to move in the opposite direction to two flanking test gratings. Magnitudes of motion contrast generated with first and second-order stimuli were compared. Methods. Two types of targets were used; static and counterphase gratings. First-order stimuli were luminance modulations of a uniform field, and second-order stimuli were contrast modulation of a random-dot filed. Both were sinusoidal grating of 0.25c/deg. The magnitude of motion induction was measured by a motion-nulling method using the double-random-staircase procedure. Results. When the target was a static grating, the second-order stimuli induced little or no motion contrast, while the first-order stimuli of the same effective contrast produced strong motion contrast. When the target was a counterphase grating both the first- and second-order stimuli produced strong motion contrast. Conclusions. Second-order stimuli can induce motion in a dynamic target but not in a static one. It is possible that, similar to the situation for motion aftereffects (Nishida & Sato, 1995, VR), the perception of motion contrast with static and dynamic targets are mediated by different mechanisms. The implications of the present results on the issue of second-order input to the relative motion processing system will be discussed.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until