Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Workers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This article explores the past and future of scholarship in labour law. It is organized as follows. Section 2 addresses the formation and regulation of individual employment contracts, but its primary concern is the law that enables or disables the transformation of the individual contract into collective bargaining. After the 1960s, the dominant frameworks' treatment of collective and individual labour relations faced four sources of disruption: chronic failures in the implementation of existing statutes (Section 3); legislative enactments that cut against or fall outside the scholarly consensus (Section 4); growing disjunctures between existing labour-law regimes and fast-changing political economy (Section 5); and insurgent intellectual movements (Section 6). Section 7 describes two concepts that increasingly animate legal scholarship - pragmatism and reflexivity.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until