Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Inequalities in bariatric surgery in Australia: findings from 49,364 obese participants in a prospective cohort study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Korda, Rosemary J.
Jorm, Louisa R.
Butler, James R.G.
Banks, Emily

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Australasian Medical Publishing Company

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate variation, and quantify socioeconomic inequalities, in receipt of primary bariatric surgery in an obese population. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective population-based cohort study of 49,364 individuals aged 45-74 with body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m2, with questionnaire (2006-09) linked to hospital and death data to July 2010. Sample drawn from the 45 and Up Study (~10% of NSW population aged ≥45 included, response rate ~18%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of bariatric surgery and adjusted rate ratios (RR) in relation to health and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Over 111,757 person-years (py) of follow-up, 312 participants underwent bariatric surgery, a rate of 27.92/10,000 py (95%CI: 24.91-31.19). Rates were highest in women, people living in major cities and those with diabetes, and increased significantly with increasing body-mass-index and number of chronic health conditions. Adjusted RRs were: 5.27 (3.18-8.73) for annual household-income ≥$70,000 versus <$20,000; and 4.01 (2.41-6.67) for those living in areas in the least- versus most-disadvantaged quintile. Private health insurance (PHI) coverage (age-sex adjusted RR: 9.25; 5.70-15.00) partially explained the observed socioeconomic inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be cost-effective in treating severe obesity and associated illnesses. While bariatric surgery rates in Australia are higher in those with health problems, large socioeconomic inequalities are apparent. Our findings suggest these procedures are largely available to those who can afford PHI and associated out-of-pocket costs, with poor access in populations who are most in need. Continuing inequalities in access are likely to exacerbate existing inequalities in obesity and related health problems.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Medical Journal of Australia 197.11 (2012): 631-636

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until