Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Inverse Design of Few-Layer Metasurfaces Empowered by the Matrix Theory of Multilayer Optics

Abstract

Few-layer metasurfaces, which are planar artificial arrays composed of more than one functional layer, have been showing unprecedented capabilities for the implementation of integrated and miniaturized optical devices with high efficiency and broad working bandwidth. However, the rich design freedoms of few-layer metasurfaces severely challenge their design and optimization. A universal strategy for the design of few-layer metasurfaces with different desired optical functionalities and an arbitrary number of layers, which can lower the design complexity and the time cost for structural optimization, is still eagerly anticipated by the scientific community. Here, we demonstrate an inverse design strategy based on deep-learning technology for the design of few-layer metasurfaces. By combining the matrix theory of multilayer optics, the proposed algorithm can predict the entire scattering matrix of a few-layer metasurface in tens of seconds with an acceptable accuracy and realize the inverse design of few-layer metasurfaces with different desired functionalities. Thus, the proposed inverse design strategy provides an efficient solution for the reduction of the design complexity of few-layer metasurfaces and significantly lowers the time cost for the structural optimization when compared with the numerical simulation methods based on an iterative process of trial and error, which will be of benefit to and expand the related research.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Physical Review Applied

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until