Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Inferring astrophysical parameters using the 2D cylindrical power spectrum from reionization

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Enlightening our understanding of the first galaxies responsible for driving reionization requires detecting the 21-cm signal from neutral hydrogen. Interpreting the wealth of information embedded in this signal requires Bayesian inference. Parameter inference from the 21-cm signal is primarily restricted to the spherically averaged power spectrum (1D PS) owing to its relatively straightforward derivation of an analytic likelihood function enabling traditional Monte Carlo Markov Chain approaches. However, in recent years, simulation-based inference (SBI) has become feasible which removes the necessity of having an analytic likelihood, enabling more complex summary statistics of the 21-cm signal to be used for Bayesian inference. In this work, we use SBI, specifically marginal neural ratio estimation to learn the likelihood-to-evidence ratio with SWYFT, to explore parameter inference using the cylindrically averaged 2D PS. Since the 21-cm signal is anisotropic, the 2D PS should yield more constraining information compared to the 1D PS which isotropically averages the signal. For this, we consider a mock 1000 h observation of the 21-cm signal using the Square Kilometre Array and compare the performance of the 2D PS relative to the 1D PS. Additionally, we explore two separate foreground mitigation strategies, perfect foreground removal and wedge avoidance. We find the 2D PS outperforms the 1D PS by improving the marginalized uncertainties on individual astrophysical parameters by up to ∼ 30–40 per cent irrespective of the foreground mitigation strategy. Primarily, these improvements stem from how the 2D PS distinguishes between the transverse, k⊥, and redshift-dependent, k∥, information which enables greater sensitivity to the complex reionization morphology.

Description

Citation

Source

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until