Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Risk-sharing and social justice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Much political behavior can be interpreted as the pursuit of more or less naked self-interest. This chapter focuses on the growth of social security programmes, not on the growth of public expenditures in general or even on the growth of social spending broadly conceived. In so far as it is seen to be anything other than a mere social-structural epiphenomenon, welfare-state benevolence is ordinarily explained in terms of “altruism�? and “sympathy�?. There is of course a long history of explanations of the welfare state along the lines of principled behavior. An analysis couched in terms of principled behavior might be useful for explaining certain marginal details of welfare-state provision. Security is the chief end of civilization, and as it progresses, the fortunes of individuals are upon the whole made less liable to derangement. The British case has, deservedly, received a good deal of attention from those concerned with both empirical and normative aspects of modern welfare states.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until