Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

International disaster relief law and article 38(1)(c) of the statute of the international court of justice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Disaster mitigation in international disaster relief law operates largely in the area of soft law, with various institutions encouraging the adoption of guidelines and best practice standards by national governments. Current international law regulation of disaster risk reduction is scarce-no conventional obligations require states to mitigate disasters within their own territories. Further, the primarily internal nature of such requirements means customary international law, best used to regulate external state behavior, struggles to govern disaster mitigation. However, when examining the existing international law for state disaster mitigation, a third source of law may be most appropriate-the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. This chapter explains how general principles as a source of law could be used to develop international law with regard to disaster risk reduction, using a case study of wildfire risk management.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until