Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Recovery of Cognitive Function After Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract

Christensen B, Colella B, Inness E, Hebert D, Monette G, Bayley M, Green RE. Recovery of cognitive function after traumatic brain injury: a multilevel modeling analysis of Canadian outcomes. Objective: To ascertain patterns of cognitive recovery during the first year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Specifically, differential recovery across cognitive domains was investigated. Design: Prospective, longitudinal, naturalistic, 1-year follow-up study. Setting: Large, urban inpatient neurorehabilitation program. Participants: Patients (N=75) with moderate to severe TBI. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Patients with TBI were followed over the course of 1 year, during which participants' neuropsychological status was repeatedly evaluated at 3 time points (2, 5, and 12 months postinjury). Results: Multilevel modeling results were consistent with previous research, demonstrating that recovery in the first year postinjury is asymptotic in nature, with more accelerated recovery occurring during the first 5 to 6 months. Importantly, results also suggest that recovery is not uniform across cognitive domains. From 2 to 5 months postinjury, steeper recovery curves were revealed for indices of memory, speeded executive function, verbal abstraction, and manual dexterity relative to untimed tests of executive function and word knowledge. Recovery trajectories did not significantly vary as a function of cognitive domain over the course of the last 5 to 12 months. Conclusions: These results are the first to explore trajectories of recovery directly as a function of multiple cognitive domains. They are expected to have implications for rehabilitative efforts as well as our understanding of the architecture of natural recovery after TBI.

Description

Citation

Source

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until