Prices versus rationing: Marshallian surplus and mandatory water restrictions
Loading...
Date
Authors
Grafton, R. Quentin
Ward, Michael
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University
Abstract
We estimate an aggregate daily water demand for Sydney using rainfall, temperature, and price data for the period 1994-2005. The estimated demand is used to calculate the difference in Marshallian surplus between using the metered price of household water to regulate total consumption in Sydney versus mandatory water restrictions for the period 2004/2005. Using a choke price of $5.05/kL for outdoor water demand, equal to the levelised cost of supplying and storing rainwater in a household water tank, we calculate the loss in Marshallian surplus from using mandatory water restrictions to be $235 million for the period 1 June 2004 to 1 June 2005. On a per capita basis this equates to approximately $55 per person or about $150 per household — a little less than half the average Sydney household water bill in 2005.
Description
Citation
Grafton, R.Q., & Ward, M. (2007). Prices versus rationing: Marshallian surplus and mandatory water restrictions. International and Development Economics Paper 07-05. Canberra, ACT: Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University.
Collections
Source
The Economic Record
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description