Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Taxonomies in the Philosophy of Well-Being

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This paper surveys a number of competing taxonomies within the philosophy of well-being. I begin by sketching out the subject matter of well-being and the purpose of a taxonomy. I then proceed by reviewing each taxonomy systematically; describing their classificatory structure and explaining their perceived strengths and weaknesses. I finish by giving a speculative explanation as to why there are various taxonomies: that particular classificatory divisions might better support some theories of well-being over others. If so, it would make sense to pick a taxonomy that supported one’s own favored theory of well-being and reject any taxonomy that might place said theory into disrepute.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Stevenson, C M 2015, 'Taxonomies in the Philosophy of Well-Being', Unpublished manuscript. < https://www.academia.edu/23982732/Taxonomies_in_the_Philosophy_of_Well_Being >

Source

Book Title

Unpublished manuscript

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until