Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Rigid Graph Control Architectures for Autonomous Formations

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Anderson, Brian
Yu, Changbin (Brad)
Fidan, Baris
Hendrickx, Julien M

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE Inc)

Abstract

For millions of years, nature has presented examples of collective behavior in groups of insects, birds, and fish. This behavior has arisen to permit sophisticated functions of the group that cannot be achieved by individual members [1], [2]. Collective behavior serves needs such as foraging for food, defense against predators, aggression against prey, and mating. Fish and birds particularly, as part of their group behavior, often display formation- type behavior. In this type of behavior, the relative positions of the fish or birds are preserved, and the formation moves as a cohesive whole. From time to time, a formation may split, rearrange itself in a minor way, perhaps to remove a burden on one or more members of the formation, or rearrange itself in a major way, perhaps for obstacle avoidance, predator avoidance, or merging with another formation.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

IEEE Control Systems

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until