Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Open-loop vs. closed-loop identification of Box-Jenkins systems in a least costly identification context

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Anderson, Brian

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Conference Organising Committee

Abstract

In this paper, we compare open-loop and closed-loop prediction error identification. In particular, we determine whether open-loop or closed-loop identification is optimal in the least costly identification experiment design framework. The least costly experiment design framework is a new framework for optimal experiment design where the objective is to determine the cheapest identification while ensuring that the accuracy of the identified model is above some nominated threshold. A second contribution of this paper is to develop a control design algorithm which ensures that the designed controller both ensures sufficient closed-loop performance with the true system, but also ensures that a model identified via closed-loop identification on the designed loop has high accuracy.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

2007 European Control Conference, ECC 2007

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until