Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Banks, Emily
Meirik, Olav
Farley, Tim
Akande , O
Bathija, Heli
Ali, Mohamed
Fahmy, Amel

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Lancet Publishing Group

Abstract

Background: Reliable evidence about the effect of female genital mutilation (FGM) on obstetric outcome is scarce. This study examines the effect of different types of FGM on obstetric outcome. Methods: 28 393 women attending for singleton delivery between November, 2001, and March, 2003, at 28 obstetric centres in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sudan were examined before delivery to ascertain whether or not they had undergone FGM, and were classified according to the WHO system: FGM I, removal of the prepuce or clitoris, or both; FGM II, removal of clitoris and labia minora; and FGM III, removal of part or all of the external genitalia with stitching or narrowing of the vaginal opening. Prospective information on demographic, health, and reproductive factors was gathered. Participants and their infants were followed up until maternal discharge from hospital. Findings: Compared with women without FGM, the adjusted relative risks of certain obstetric complications were, in women with FGM I, II, and III, respectively: caesarean section 1·03 (95% CI 0·88-1·21), 1·29 (1·09-1·52), 1·31 (1·01-1·70); postpartum haemorrhage 1·03 (0·87-1·21), 1·21 (1·01-1·43), 1·69 (1·34-2·12); extended maternal hospital stay 1·15 (0·97-1·35), 1·51 (1·29-1·76), 1·98 (1·54-2·54); infant resuscitation 1·11 (0·95-1·28), 1·28 (1·10-1·49), 1·66 (1·31-2·10), stillbirth or early neonatal death 1·15 (0·94-1·41), 1·32 (1·08-1·62), 1·55 (1·12-2·16), and low birthweight 0·94 (0·82-1·07), 1·03 (0·89-1·18), 0·91 (0·74-1·11). Parity did not significantly affect these relative risks. FGM is estimated to lead to an extra one to two perinatal deaths per 100 deliveries. Interpretation: Women with FGM are significantly more likely than those without FGM to have adverse obstetric outcomes. Risks seem to be greater with more extensive FGM.

Description

Citation

Source

Lancet, The (UK edition)

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31