Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The performance of Australian legislatures in protecting rights

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This chapter focuses on reframe the discussion of the role of Australian parliaments as rights protectors, in part by reframing the influential concept of 'dialogue’ now so prominent in the literature on relationships between parliaments and courts. It discusses that parliaments are 'writing rights’ on a regular basis when passing legislation and that much of this routine but quite fundamental rights-protection passes without note in much of the international rights-protection literature. The chapter suggests that the general properties of the Australian constitutional order are best illustrated through the instance of the federal Constitution of 1901. It also discusses that Australian constitutional order itself reflects a larger constitutional commitment to a neglected model of rights-protection. The chapter argues that at the national level where rights-protection by parliaments has probably been at its strongest, the Commonwealth Parliament’s constitutional role in rights-protection has been overshadowed by the scholarly prominence given to the High Court.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until