Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Sequential sampling with systematic selection for estimating mean dominant height

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The theory of sequential sampling relies on a random selection of observations. Selecting observations systematically in populations that are not themselves randomly ordered can cause a disproportionate number of incorrect decisions and/or sample sizes to be larger than what would be expected if randomly selected. However, if the customary precautions for systematic sampling normally observed in forestry surveys are taken (e.g. a random starting point, running sampling lines across the variation in the population), use of sequential sampling for estimating the mean dominant height of a forest should not produce estimates with unacceptable levels of bias. Although sample sizes will be larger, on average, than for randomly selected observations, sequential sampling of systematically selected samples may reduce the amount of field inventory work required for estimating forest population values.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australian Forestry

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until