Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Separating the Persecutors from the Persecuted: A Feminist and Comparative Examination of Exclusion from the Refugee Regime

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Ogg, Kate

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

In the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Convention), article 1F (the exclusion clause) provides that those who have committed certain crimes are excluded from refugee status. Since the 1990s the exclusion clause has been increasingly applied and often to those who played minor roles in the commission of offences and were not in positions of authority. This widening net of exclusion has prompted UNHCR and many refugee law scholars to reconsider which legal safeguards might avoid over-extending the net of exclusion. One suggested reform is the use of international criminal law (ICL). This article will critically examine the use of ICL in exclusion assessments from a feminist perspective. It will do this by conducting a comparative analysis of cases in which women have been excluded from the Convention's protection in the USA, which does not refer to ICL, and the UK, which draws heavily on this body of law. The women in these cases committed their crimes under highly coercive circumstances in which they were victims of torture, deprivation of liberty, and sexual violence. However, it will be demonstrated that both the legal approaches to exclusion in the USA and the UK masked the impact of these coercions and provided a fragmented understanding of the circumstances that led to the offence. This fragmentation is inconsistent with UNHCR guidance, calling on decision makers to assess the full circumstances of the case, and recent exclusion jurisprudence, requiring an assessment of all the circumstances to determine whether the asylum seeker lacked a 'moral choice'. Yet this guidance and jurisprudence has never been applied because there is no established legal framework in which to examine how broader circumstances impact on 'moral choice'. Therefore, the second part of this article undertakes a purposive interpretation of the exclusion clause to explore the meaning of 'moral choice' in refugee law.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

International Journal of Refugee Law

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31