Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Surface passivation of boron-diffused p-type silicon surfaces with (1 0 0) and (1 1 1) orientations by ALD Al2O3 layers

Abstract

Boron-diffused p+/n/p+ and undiffused silicon samples with (1 0 0) and (1 1 1) orientations passivated by aluminum oxide (Al2 O3) that is synthesized by atomic layer deposition (ALD) have been investigated. Emitter saturation current densities of ∼24, 29, and 33 fA/cm 2 were obtained for (1 0 0) samples with symmetrical 85Ω B diffusions that were passivated by plasma-assisted, H2O-based, and O 3-based ALD Al2O 3, respectively. Compared with undiffused samples, it was found that the additional surface doping from the diffusion reduces recombination at the Al2O3/Si interface in the case of relatively low surface boron concentrations (< 2×10 19 cm-3). The degree of surface passivation that is observed on (1 0 0) surfaces was generally better than on (1 1 1) surfaces, particularly for undiffused samples, but this difference effectively disappeared following the application of more negative charge by corona charging. From capacitance-voltage measurements, it was found that Al2 O3 films on substrates with a (1 0 0) orientation display a higher negative fixed charge density Qf than films on (1 1 1) samples. On the other hand, the interface state density Dit was not strongly influenced by surface orientation of the substrate. It appears that the difference in negative charge density is at least partly responsible for the differences in the observed passivation.

Description

Citation

Source

IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until