Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Techno-economic assessment of a numbering-up approach for a 100 MWe third generation sodium-salt CSP system

Abstract

This work presents the design and techno-economic analysis of a 100 MWe concentrated solar power (CSP) system using a supercritical CO2 power block with 700 °C input temperature. Aiming to leverage the relatively higher efficiency of small heliostat fields and potential multi-build discounts, a numbering-up approach is examined, developing four alternative configurations (1×100, 2×50, 3×33, and 4×25 MW˙e), in which each module has its own dedicated tower, heliostat field, receiver, thermal storage and power block. A comprehensive techno-economic model is combined with detailed annual simulations to yield levelised cost of energy (LCOE) estimations and analyse the potential of system numbering-up for high-temperature next-generation CSP systems based on liquid heat transfer fluids (HTFs). The simulations are verified against the System Advisor Model with differences in the LCOE calculations within ±1.0%. Comparing the four systems shows that a 1×100 MW˙e system leads to an LCOE of 54.88 USD/MWh˙e, lower than for the numbered-up modules. However, the LCOE difference between configurations with one and two modules is moderate, with the 2×50 MW˙e configuration showing an LCOE of 55.99 USD/MWh˙e (+2%). Despite their higher annual conversion efficiencies, the 3×33 MW˙e and 4×25 MW˙e systems are more capital-intensive and escalate LCOE by 6.9 and 12.2%, respectively. With size-dependent power block efficiency, further LCOE escalation with numbered-up systems is observed, however, multi-build savings could potentially reverse this cost escalation and a 13.9–19.6% saving on the two-module system would allow them to break even.

Description

Citation

Source

Solar Energy

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until