Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Quasi-realism and fundamental moral error

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Egan, Andy

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

A common first reaction to expressivist and quasi-realist theories is the thought that, if these theories are right, there's some objectionable sense in which we can't be wrong about morality. This worry turns out to be surprisingly difficult to make stickan account of moral error as instability under improving changes provides the quasi-realist with the resources to explain many of our concerns about moral error. The story breaks down, though, in the case of fundamental moral error. This is where the initial worry finally sticksquasi-realism tells me that I can't be fundamentally wrong about morality, though others can.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31