Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A terminal Pleistocene open site on the Hawkesbury River,: Pitt Town, New South Wales

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Williams, Alan
Mitchell, Peter
Wright, Richard V S
Toms, Phillip S.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Australian Archaeology Association

Abstract

Salvage excavations of 25 m 2 on a levee adjacent to the Hawkesbury River near Pitt Town, New South Wales, identified a 1.5 m deep sand body containing three discrete artefact assemblages, collectively designated as site PT12. Six optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages provide a chronology for the sand body, which began forming >50 ka. Peak artefact numbers for the two lowest assemblages were centred on ca 15 ka and ca 11 ka, and had Capertian (pre-Bondaian) characteristics. These included amorphous pebble tools and manuports of locally-derived river cobbles, which were probably exposed through entrenchment of the river during lower sea-levels. Comparisons with the KII rockshelter, approximately 20 km upstream, show a similar assemblage dated to ca 13 ka. The uppermost assemblage at PT12 was dominated by backed artefacts and composed primarily of silcrete. Reliable OSL ages indicate this assemblage may have been deposited in the early Holocene, with a proliferation of backed blades occurring ca 5 ka, although typological comparisons with other local assemblages suggest an age of <4.5 ka is more likely. Along with other studies, the site indicates the systematic exploitation of resources along the Hawkesbury River from ca 15 ka before an apparent abandonment of the region in the early/mid-Holocene. Late Holocene artefact numbers suggest a subdued reoccupation of the area following this hiatus.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australian Archaeology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2037-12-31