Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Suction versus no suction for chest drain management

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: In any age group or pathology requiring an intrathoracic chest drain does the addition of suction improve clinical outcomes? In draining the pleural space using underwater seal, one-way valve (or any other type of drain identified from the search) is the use of suction compared to without suction safer or more effective at evacuating either air, blood, fluid or pus? In draining the mediastinal space using underwater seal, one-way valve (or any other type of drain identified from the search) is the use of suction compared to without suction safer and more effective from evacuating air, blood and fluids? If suction is found to be beneficial when applied to chest drains (pleural and or mediastinal), what are the optimum pressures that should be used for adults, children and neonates?.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until