Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Assessing the quality of life of adults with chronic respiratory diseases in routine primary care

dc.contributor.authorJacobs, J. E.en
dc.contributor.authorMaillé, A. R.en
dc.contributor.authorAkkermans, R. P.en
dc.contributor.authorVan Weel, C.en
dc.contributor.authorGrol, R. P.T.M.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-16T01:29:27Z
dc.date.available2025-03-16T01:29:27Z
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.description.abstractBackground: As doctors' judgements about the burden of a disease often differ from patients' own assessments a manageable method to incorporate the latter into routine care might support patientcentered decisionmaking. For this purpose we shortened the 55-Item Quality of Life for Respiratory Illness Questionnaire (QoL-RIQ). Methods: Secondary analyses of the data of 3 controlled studies (n = 328, 502 and 555). Procedures: inter-item correlations, scale distributions, Cronbach's α and factor analysis. Dyspnoea, forced expiratory volume in 1 (FEV 1), COOP/WONCA charts, the Medical Research Council-ECCS symptoms questionnaire and the MOS-SF 36 served as criteria to test validity and responsiveness. Results: Item-reduction resulted in a 10item short form (α's 0.87-0.90), consisting of 2 5-item factors: (1) physical and emotional complaints and (2) physical and social limitations. The correlations of the short form with dyspnoea (r from 0.57 to 0.60), the generic health status instruments (r from 0.39 to 0.59) and lung function (r from 0.10 to 0.15) fulfilled the criteria. Further results: a clinical relevant score difference (> 0.5) between upper and lower quartiles of the convergent instruments, an intraclass correlation between repeated scores in a stable group of 0.82 and a standardised response mean of 0.86 in an improved group of patients. Conclusions: The short form (RIQ-MON10) maintained the psychometric properties of the original instrument and is promising for assessing quality of life (QoL) during routine primary care visits.en
dc.description.statustrueen
dc.format.extent11en
dc.identifier.otherresearchoutputwizard:U3488905xPUB10282en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:3042840560en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:221938300009en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace-test.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/733717674
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042840560&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.sourceQuality of Life Researchen
dc.subjectAsthmaen
dc.subjectChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)en
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifeen
dc.subjectMonitoring questionnaireen
dc.subjectPrimary careen
dc.titleAssessing the quality of life of adults with chronic respiratory diseases in routine primary careen
dc.typeArticleen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1127en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1117en
local.contributor.affiliationJacobs, J. E.; Centre for Quality of Care Researchen
local.contributor.affiliationMaillé, A. R.; Centre for Quality of Care Researchen
local.contributor.affiliationAkkermans, R. P.; Centre for Quality of Care Researchen
local.contributor.affiliationVan Weel, C.; Centre for Quality of Care Researchen
local.contributor.affiliationGrol, R. P.T.M.; Centre for Quality of Care Researchen
local.identifier.citationvolume13en
local.identifier.doi10.1023/B:QURE.0000031338.88928.e9en
local.identifier.pure8c36ae80-6c8f-43fb-a029-3d6c699ab372en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads