Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Bugs in Anglo-American products liability

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Introduction The face of European products liability may be about to change considerably. The first places where change probably will occur are in the procedural and funding areas. Though the density of European products cases has been and probably will continue to be slight compared to that in the United States, it is of note that a growing trend within the European case law is a shift to multi-party actions. Proposed procedural rule changes are about to fuel this shift. At the same time, fundamental changes in the way civil litigation is funded within European Union Member States have disproportionately encouraged group actions. They have also shifted greater risk, responsibility and power to plaintiffs' lawyers. On the legislative front, the reform of the separate European products liability doctrine, set out in the 1985 European Directive on Product Liability, is on hold. Following both a Green Paper and a White Paper, the European Commission (the Commission) concluded that it had insufficient evidence to advise on the future of the Directive at present, and thus, it has both set up an expert advisory committee and funded two major research studies on products liability in Europe. These studies are to collect information, particularly on the costs that might result from any future repeal of the most controversial defence in the Directive.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until