Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

How do staff influence the quality of long-term dementia care and the lives of residents? A systematic review of the evidence

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Katrinaen
dc.contributor.authorBird, Mikeen
dc.contributor.authorMacPherson, Sarahen
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Annalieseen
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-04T02:29:06Z
dc.date.available2025-04-04T02:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Research suggests and common sense indicates that there are relationships between staff variables in residential dementia care and the quality of life (QOL) of residents, with poor care due to staff factors increasing resident suffering. Despite these indications, we do not have a coherent picture of these relationships, which variables are important, and where to intervene in order to minimize suffering for people with dementia. Methods: This systematic review examined associations between staff variables, quality of care (QOC), and QOL for residents, using published peer-reviewed literature from the last 20 years. A comprehensive search was conducted using an exhaustive list of search terms, leading to the identification of 33,204 unique papers, which was reduced to 35 on-topic papers. Results: In the main, we were able to provide collective evidence to suggest there are relationships between potentially adjustable staff variables and QOC on to QOL. When staff treat and interact empathetically and humanely in care, there is a relationship with better mood for residents, delayed functional dependence and better food intake. Where staff are more skilled and educated, there is less psychotropic medication use. Unlimited empathy about the risk of residents falling or being in pain is not enough; staff need to know about the dangers of restraint. Conclusions: Confidence in these indicative links is weakened by a lack of high-quality prospective longitudinal studies focusing on potentially adjustable staff variables, with a bias towards cross-sectional studies including only variables that are fixed or unlikely to change.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded through the NHMRC Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People (CDPC). We want to express our great appreciation for the timely guidance provided by the members of our consultative committee: Jennifer Henderson (Consumer Dementia Research Network); Meredith Gresham (Hammond Care); Jan Van Emden (Helping Hand); Katrina Radford (Griffith University). We also want to acknowledge the assistance that Suzanne Hannan (Southern NSW LHD Library Manager) provided with the initial search strategy.en
dc.description.statustrueen
dc.format.extent19en
dc.identifier.otherresearchoutputwizard:a383154xPUB38912en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:84963620344en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace-test.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/733754247
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963620344&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © Copyright 2016 International Psychogeriatric Association.en
dc.sourceInternational Psychogeriatricsen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectlong-termen
dc.subjectquality of careen
dc.subjectquality of lifeen
dc.subjectresidentialen
dc.subjectstaffen
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen
dc.titleHow do staff influence the quality of long-term dementia care and the lives of residents? A systematic review of the evidenceen
dc.typeReview articleen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1281en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1263en
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Katrina; Canberra Clinical School, School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBird, Mike; Australian Governmenten
local.contributor.affiliationMacPherson, Sarah; Research School of Psychology, School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBlair, Annaliese; Medicine Teaching, School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume28en
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610216000570en
local.identifier.pureb62c9c89-146a-4ed4-8043-10a1a52ce759en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads