Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Critique of the article, ‘Theoretical foundations of phenomenography

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This is a critique of the paper, Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography: A Critical Review (Hajar, 2021. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844). This critique highlights misrepresentations of phenomenography within the paper, in particular that the example of phenomenographic research outcomes presented in the paper misrepresents both the object of study and the structure of the outcome space in phenomenographic research. Issues raised by Hajar with respect to the role of the researcher in phenomenographic research, the relative functions of bracketing and interpretive awareness during phenomenographic analysis, and the use of sociocultural perspectives and the notion of individual lifeworlds in phenomenography are also discussed.

Description

Citation

Source

Higher Education Research and Development

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until