Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Language evolution and human history: What a difference a date makes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Gray, Russell
Atkinson, Quentin D.
Greenhill, Simon

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Royal Society of London

Abstract

Historical inference is at its most powerful when independent lines of evidence can be integrated into a coherent account. Dating linguistic and cultural lineages can potentially play a vital role in the integration of evidence from linguistics, anthropology, archaeology and genetics. Unfortunately, although the comparative method in historical linguistics can provide a relative chronology, it cannot provide absolute date estimates and an alternative approach, called glottochronology, is fundamentally flawed. In this paperwe outline howcomputational phylogeneticmethods can reliably estimate language divergence dates and thus help resolve long-standing debates about human prehistory ranging from the origin of the Indo-European language family to the peopling of the Pacific.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31