Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

C-H⋯X hydrogen bonds of acetylene, ethylene, and ethane with first - and second row hydrides

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The structures and binding energies of a series of C-H⋯X hydrogen-bonded complexes involving acetylene, ethylene, and ethane as proton donors and the first- and second-row hydrides CH4, NH3, OH2, FH, PH3, SH2, and CIH as proton acceptors have been determined. Geometries were optimized with both the MP2 and the B3-LYP methods in conjuction with the 6-311+G(3df,2p) basis set. In general, we note good agreement between MP2 and B3-LYP hydrogen-bonded structures. However, for some very weakly bound complexes larger differences exist, particularly in the r(H⋯X) distance, and in these instances the MP2 results are determined (from comparative CCSD(T) calculations) to be more reliable. The CCSD(T)/6-311-fG(3df,2p) binding energies (De), which include corrections for basis set superposition errors, are very similar for the MP2 and B3-LYP geometries, reflecting the relative insensitivity of De to geometry for weakly bound complexes. The C-H⋯X hydrogen-bond strength (Do) shows a considerable dependence on the acidity of the C-H donor group and on the nature of the proton-accepting group. The strongest hydrogen bonds are formed between acetylene and either NH3 (9.2 kJ mol-1) or OH2 (7.7 kJ mol-1)- These values decrease significantly for the corresponding complexes between acetylene and FH, CH4 or the second-row hydrides. The binding energies for the complexes between ethylene and either NH3 or OH2 (2.1 and 1.5 kJ mol-1, respectively) are much smaller than those of the corresponding acetylene complexes. The complexes between ethylene and PH3, SH2 or ClH, as well as the complexes between ethane and NH3 or H2O, are more weakly bound again and have binding energies less than 1.0 kJ mol-1.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until