Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Tetragonisca guard bees interpret expanding and contracting patterns as unintended displacement in space

dc.contributor.authorKelber, A.en
dc.contributor.authorZeil, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-29T15:21:28Z
dc.date.available2025-03-29T15:21:28Z
dc.date.issued1997en
dc.description.abstractGuard bees of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula (Apidae: Meliponinae) hover in stable positions in front of the nest to protect the flight corridor leading to the nest entrance against insect intruders. To unravel the visual control of station keeping, we exposed these hovering guards to expanding and contracting patterns at the nest front. The bees fly away from an expanding pattern and towards the centre of a contracting pattern along a line connecting their initial position and the centre of expansion regardless of where in the visual field they view the pattern. The response of bees to a spinning radial pattern is different: they fly parallel to the pattern, up and down or forward and backward depending on whether they initially hover to the side, above or below the centre of rotation. The bees respond to horizontal and to vertical expansion and contraction. They also adjust their distance relative to a rotating spiral which produces a realistic flow field and thus allowed us to test to what extent the bees minimize image motion speed. We find that guard bees indeed move in the appropriate direction to minimize the image motion speed they experience. A comparison of bees hovering at different distances from the nestfront at the onset of pattern motion and experiencing very different image velocities shows that the dynamics of the reaction is quite uniform. At the pattern velocities tested, we did not find evidence that guard bees use image motion to control their flight speed. The bees' response rather suggests that the underlying mechanism might be insensitive to the size of motion vectors.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAcknowledgements The study was made possible by cooperation between Tübingen University, Germany and PUC University, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Financial support came from the Grad-uiertenkolleg Neurobiologie, Tübingen University, and the Stud-ienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes to AK, and from the DFG (SFB 307) to JZ. We thank Rainer Radtke and Dieter Wittmann for their help and support in Porto Alegre, Heinz Bendele for image processing and software support and Ulrike Brünnert for data analysis. We are grateful to Hans-Jürgen Dahmen, Hans-Ortwin Nalbach, Dezsö Varjú and the two referees for helpful discussions and for their suggestions for improving the manuscript.en
dc.description.statustrueen
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.otherScopus:0030850297en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace-test.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/733746735
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030850297&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.sourceJournal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiologyen
dc.subjectFlight controlen
dc.subjectHymenopteraen
dc.subjectMotion detectionen
dc.subjectOptic flowen
dc.subjectStation keepingen
dc.subjectTetragonisca angustulaen
dc.subjectVisual behaviouren
dc.titleTetragonisca guard bees interpret expanding and contracting patterns as unintended displacement in spaceen
dc.typeArticleen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage265en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage257en
local.contributor.affiliationKelber, A.; Group Administration, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationZeil, J.; Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume181en
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s003590050112en
local.identifier.pure8b50d16c-84ef-4fcd-a9e6-ed20e010e2a5en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads