Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Genesis of the strand-biased signature in somatic hypermutation of rearranged immunoglobulin variable genes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Steele, Edward J
Franklin, Andrew
Blanden, Robert

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

The history and current development of the reverse transcriptase model of somatic hypermutation (RT-model) is reviewed with particular reference to the genesis of strand-biased mutation signatures in rearranged immunoglobulin variable genes (V(D)J). The recent disagreement in the field as to whether strand bias really exists or not has been critically analysed and the confusion traced to the putative presence, in some mutated V(D)J sequence collections, of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-recombinant artefacts. Recent analysis of somatic hypermutation in xeroderma pigmentosum variant patients, by the group of PJ Gearhart and others, has established that the Y-family translesion DNA repair enzyme, DNA polymerase η (eta), is responsible for the striking A-T targeted strand-bias mutation signature seen in all mouse and human collections of somatically mutated V(D)J sequences. This evidence, together with our own recent demonstration that human DNA polymerase η is a reverse transcriptase, leads to the conclusion that the strand-biased A-T mutation signature is caused either by: (i) error-prone DNA-dependent DNA repair synthesis by pol-η of single-strand nicks preferentially in the non-transcribed strand; and/or (ii) by error-prone cDNA synthesis of the transcribed strand by pol-η using the pre-mRNA as the copying template, primed by the nicked transcribed DNA strand, followed by replacement of the original transcribed strand by cDNA. Analysis of the total mutation pattern also suggests that the major transitions observed in SHM (A→G, C→T and G→A) can be explained by known RNA editing mechanisms active on pre-mRNA which are then written into cDNA during synthesis of the transcribed strand by error-prone cellular reverse transcriptases such as pol-η.

Description

Citation

Source

Immunology and Cell Biology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until