Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Opportunity lost

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Two factors account for Taiwan's failure to consolidate democratic rule through constitutional revision even after the island's remarkably successful decade of democratization. First, though the two leading parties shared a common interest in working out a smooth pattern of liberalization and democratization, vital reforms of the constitutional and electoral systems were either not in the strategic interests of the major parties, or not of crucial importance to the parties, especially to President Lee and the Kuomintang Party, who were in the stronger position as the ruling party. Second, the parties were constrained by the existing Constitution and their own policy platforms, both of which were profoundly shaped by Taiwan's conflict with mainland China. The KMT was forced to work within a constitutional structure derived from its period on the mainland, while the DPP's stance on revisions was constrained by the priority it placed on increasing Taiwan's sense of independence.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

China Journal

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until