Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparative life cycle energy analysis of carbon fibre pre-processing, processing and post-processing recycling methods

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The use of carbon fibre reinforced polymers (CFRP) faces high energy consumption of carbon fibre production and a lack of recycling. Increasing the use of recycled carbon fibres (rCF) to substitute virgin carbon fibres (vCF) can improve the sustainability of the carbon fibre industry. Nonetheless, the most impactful area of CF recycling on the quality of recycled CFRP (rCFRP) is unclear. In this study, a life cycle energy analysis compares the Primary Energy Demand (PED) of an rCFRP automotive roof panel with different CF recycling methods in the pre-processing, processing and post-processing stage. Results indicate that retaining CF architecture during the pre-processing stage reduces the cradle-to-gate energy demand of an rCFRP roof panel by 26.3%. Fibre realignment in the post-processing stage leads to 11.4% higher cradle-to-gate energy consumption of an rCFRP roof panel, despite improvements in the stiffness of rCFRP. This study demonstrates the significant impact of the pre-processing and post-processing stages of CF recycling on the quality and production energy demand of rCFRP. Moreover, improvement in the architecture of rCF leads to a more significant conservation of energy during rCFRP component production than preserving the tensile properties of rCF.

Description

Citation

Source

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until