Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Meningococcal vaccination for adolescents? An economic evaluation in Victoria

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Skull, Sue
Butler, James

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

Objective: To undertake an economic evaluation of the options for vaccination of adolescents using meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine based on Victorian data. Methodology: Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of three options for vaccination were undertaken for hypothetical populations aged 15-19 years. Baseline analyses assumed a single year of programme implementation and vaccine protection of 5 years. Sensitivity analyses of key variables were performed. Outcomes included the number of people vaccinated, cases averted, life years saved and disability adjusted life years (DALY) averted. Lost earnings avoided were included as a measure of vaccination benefit in cost-benefit analyses. Results: Vaccination of people in Years 10-12 (secondary school) and first year university within a defined population with a high rate of disease was the most cost-effective option. Excluding direct cost savings and compared with no vaccination, this resulted in a discounted cost per DALY avoided of $17 646 and benefits exceeding costs in discounted terms. The 'break-even' incidence rate for this option in the cost-benefit analysis was 11.9/100 000. Conclusions: Economic evidence favours the use of vaccination within well-defined populations with a high rate of disease.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until