Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Hybrid compact neural architecture for visual place recognition

Abstract

State-of-The-Art algorithms for visual place recognition, and related visual navigation systems, can be broadly split into two categories: computer-science-oriented models including deep learning or image retrieval-based techniques with minimal biological plausibility, and neuroscience-oriented dynamical networks that model temporal properties underlying spatial navigation in the brain. In this letter, we propose a new compact and high-performing place recognition model that bridges this divide for the first time. Our approach comprises two key neural models of these categories: (1) FlyNet, a compact, sparse two-layer neural network inspired by brain architectures of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, and (2) a one-dimensional continuous attractor neural network (CANN). The resulting FlyNet+CANN network incorporates the compact pattern recognition capabilities of our FlyNet model with the powerful temporal filtering capabilities of an equally compact CANN, replicating entirely in a hybrid neural implementation the functionality that yields high performance in algorithmic localization approaches like SeqSLAM. We evaluate our model, and compare it to three state-of-The-Art methods, on two benchmark real-world datasets with small viewpoint variations and extreme environmental changes-achieving 87% AUC results under day to night transitions compared to 60% for Multi-Process Fusion, 46% for LoST-X and 1% for SeqSLAM, while being 6.5, 310, and 1.5 times faster, respectively.

Description

Citation

Source

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until