Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

After Fostif: lingering uncertainties and controversies about litigation funding

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Spender, Peta

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Thomson Reuters

Abstract

This article will examine uncertainties and controversies that remain unresolved after the High Court recognised litigation funding in Campbells Cash and Carry v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386. The uncertainties are doctrinal, eg whether the assignment of a right to litigate is valid, and systemic, eg whether the existing suite of approaches is sufficiently robust to manage the challenges presented by litigation funding. Controversies persist as to whether litigation funders promote trafficking and meddling in litigation. Recent case law demonstrates that the policy underpinning the doctrines of maintenance and champerty still has salience. However, it will be argued that effective regulation of this area requires a coordinated approach and must move across different instruments and contexts. The article will sketch out some elements of effective regulation and make suggestions for reform of the current regime.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Judicial Administration 18 (2008): 101-115

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until