Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Simulation-based training for project management education: mind the gap, as one size does not fit all

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Zwikael, Ofer
Shtub, Avraham
Chih, Ying-Yi

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers

Abstract

Project management training is an important component in engineering education; in particular, simulation-based training (SBT) is considered a valuable teaching strategy. However, the effectiveness of SBT in project management education has not been empirically examined and it remains unclear in the literature why some trainees benefit from SBT more than others. To address this gap, the authors conducted two pre-/post-test experimental design studies, involving area experts and graduate students with a range of individual differences in two project management courses in the United States and Australia. The results suggest that SBT (1) enhances trainees’ declarative knowledge only in cases of successful performance in the simulation, and the existence of an appropriate gap (discussed in the paper) between the trainees’ prior knowledge and the challenges presented by the simulator; and (2) energizes trainees’ learning processes only in cases of success in the simulation, high prior knowledge level, and positive prior attitude toward SBT. These findings advance existing theory by revealing some conditions under which SBT is more effective in project management education, and identifying individual differences that, if taken into account, may improve its value. Practical implications suggest that SBT designers should integrate various levels of difficulty into the design, and lecturers should ensure that trainees possess the required theoretical knowledge before the SBT session.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Management in Engineering

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until