Quo vadis biophotonics? Wearing serendipity and slow science as a badge of pride, and embracing biology
| dc.contributor.author | Schröder-Turk, Gerd E. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-26T00:24:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-26T00:24:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-10-01 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | This article is a reflection on the themes of the Faraday Discussion meeting on 'Biological and bio-inspired optics' held from 20 to 22 July 2020. It is a personal perspective on the nature of this field as a broad and interdisciplinary field that has led to a sound understanding of the material properties of biological nanostructured and optical materials. The article describes how the nature of the field and the themes of the conference are reflected in particular in work on the 3D bicontinuous biophotonic nanostructures known as single gyroids and in bicontinuous structures more broadly. Such single gyroid materials are found for example in the butterfly Thecla opisena, where the questions of biophotonic response, of bio-inspired optics, of the relationship between structure and function, and of the relationship between natural and synthetic realisations are closely interlinked. This multitude of facets of research on single gyroid structures reflects the beauty of the broader field of biophotonics, namely as a field that lives through embracing the serendipitous discovery of the biophotonic marvels that nature offers to us as seeds for in-depth analysis and understanding. The meandering nature of its discoveries, and the need to accept the slowness that comes from exploration of intellectually new or foreign territory, mean that the field shares some traits with biological evolution itself. Looking into the future, I consider that a closer engagement with living tissue and with the biological questions of function and formation, rather than with the materials science of biological materials, will help ensure the continuing great success of this field. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | I wish to express my gratitude to Silvia Vignolini, Leila Deravi, Matthias Kolle, Lini Li and Bodo Wilts for organising an excellent Faraday Discussion meeting on ‘Biological and bio-inspired optics’. I acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council, through grant DP200102593, meta-microscopy of insect tissue: how nature grows bicontinuous nanosolids. I am grateful to Bodo Wilts for many years of collaboration on gyroid buttery nanostructures, for joint work on the above ARC grant proposal from which some sections of this paper’s text derive and for the electron microscopy image shown in Fig. 2. I am grateful to Lucja Kowalewska and Dainius Jakubauskas for discussions of prolamellar bodies in plant plastids and for creating the illustration of the runner bean in Fig. 5. I am grateful for the serendipity that led me to Stephen Hyde’s research group in 2000, hence facilitating my introduction to the gyroid. I am grateful to Stephen Hyde and Klaus Mecke for two decades of mentorship, support and friendship. I am grateful for the serendipity that led Matthias Saba to join my research group in 2009 or so, and to Matthias Saba for embracing the topic of gyroid photonics with a depth and intellect that exceeded my own and that underpinned much of the success of our joint projects. I wish to apologise that neither the presentation I gave at the meeting nor this paper have the high quality I expect of myself. Workplace-related stress has negatively impacted – hopefully temporarily – my ability to produce high-quality research output. I wish to apologise specically to Peter Vukusic and Doekele Stavenga that I did not get a chance to show them dras of my presentation prior to the presentation even though it contained substantial reference to their work and presentations they had given; the presentation and this article represent my own opinion, and I did not seek to imply that my opinion is shared by either of them. I apologise if the inclusion of their photos may have suggested otherwise. I would also like to apologise to the Faraday Discussions staff for very poor communication on my part and unacceptable delays that they nevertheless kindly accommodated. I thank Doekele Stavenga, Lucja Kowalewska and Bodo Wilts for comments on the manuscript. | en |
| dc.description.status | true | en |
| dc.format.extent | 17 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Scopus:85094220458 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | PubMed:33034598 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace-test.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/733738303 | |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094220458&partnerID=8YFLogxK | en |
| dc.language.iso | English | en |
| dc.rights | Publisher Copyright: © The Royal Society of Chemistry. | en |
| dc.source | Faraday Discussions | en |
| dc.title | Quo vadis biophotonics? Wearing serendipity and slow science as a badge of pride, and embracing biology | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 323 | en |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 307 | en |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Schröder-Turk, Gerd E.; Murdoch University | en |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 223 | en |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1039/d0fd00108b | en |
| local.identifier.pure | a032120e-b0a2-41af-b553-6548a5882e1b | en |
| local.type.status | Published | en |