Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Film adaptations of günter Grass’s prose work

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Grass's output documents not just a history of the German language, its restitution and reinvigoration in The Tin Drum (1959) after its corruption by National Socialism, but also a history of film. Though recent scholarship has partially salvaged the 1950s as a decade not limited to escapist Heimat films, that is, films playing in 'innocent' country settings and characterised by their sentimental tone and simplistic morality, the Nazi years created a major hiatus between the glories of Weimar cinema and the beginnings of the New German Cinema around the mid-1960s. The 1970s then saw a number of film adaptations of literary texts, the two most famous being Rainer Werner Fassbinder's film version of nineteenth-century novelist Theodor Fontane's Effi Briest and Volker Schlondorff's The Tin Drum. The issue is still more complex today, when leading figures in German literature and film (Emine Sevgi Özdamar and Fatih Akin, respectively) come from ethnically mixed Turkish-German backgrounds. This chapter cannot do justice to the broader issue of film adaptations of literature, which in Germany have long been caught up in debates surrounding 'high' and 'low' art. But the case of Grass is very different to that of another frequently filmed author, Thomas Mann. The challenge posed to film by Mann's works resides in their verbal irony, particularly in the abstract nouns and Classical allusions. By contrast, Grass's larger works sprawl across linguistic canvases that are equally intricate, but which also combine levels of reality and time (for example, the context of magical realism, as discussed elsewhere in this volume) that stretch concrete images in realistic film traditions.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until