Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparative analysis and outcomes of sleeve resection versus pneumonectomy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Parissis, Harry
Leotsinidis, Michael
Hughes, Ann Maree
McGovern, Eillish
Luke, David
Young, Vincent

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Abstract

To compare the outcome of sleeve resection or complex sleeve resection versus (Vs) pneumonectomy for lung cancer in a single unit. Between 1998 and 2006, 664 lung resections were carried out. There were 129 (19.4%) pneumonectomies and 79 (11.9%) sleeve resections; Twenty one patients (26.5%) underwent a complex sleeve resection. Operative mortality for the sleeve resections (SR) was 2.5% and for the pneumonectomies 8.53%. Overall 5-year survival after SR was 46.8% and after pneumonectomy 37.1%. The survival curves for the 2 procedures after adjusting for risk factors are different. The area under the curve is higher for the SR (Hazard ratio 1.78 C.I.: 0,92-3,46). The 5-year survival for early stages favors SR. The survival for the complex SR was not influenced by the complexity of the procedure but from the TNM stage of each individual case. Multivariate analysis of risk factors affecting survival after surgery showed: male sex Hazard ratio (HR) 1.19, 0.63-2.27(95%CI), Age >63 1.38(HR), 0.78-2.48, Pneumonectomy 1.78(HR), 0.92-3.46 and stage III 4.44(HR), 1.94-10.16(95% CI). For comparative stages survival appears to be better after sleeves, moreover male sex, sleeve resection, age younger that 63 and early TNM stage are positive predictors for survival.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31