Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Poverty comparisons and household survey design

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Poverty comparisons - an increasingly important starting-point for welfare analysis - are almost based on household surveys. They therefore require that one be able to distinguish underlying differences in the populations being compared from sampling variation: standard errors must be calculated. So far, this has largely been done on the assumption that the household surveys are simple random samples. But household surveys are more complex than this It is shown that taking into account sampling design has a major effect on standard errors for well-known poverty measures: they can increase by around one-half. Making only a paryial correction for sample design (taking into account clustering, but not stratification, whether explicit or implicit) can be as misleading as not taking any account at all of sampling design.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until