Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Estimation of fractal dimension for a class of non-gaussian stationary processes and fields

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

We present the asymptotic distribution theory for a class of increment-based estimators of the fractal dimension of a random field of the form g{X(t)}, where g:R → R is an unknown smooth function and X(t) is a real-valued stationary Gaussian field on R, d -1 or 2, whose covariance function obeys a power law at the origin. The relevant theoretical framework here is "fixed domain" (or "infill") asymptotics. Surprisingly, the limit theory in this non-Gaussian case is somewhat richer than in the Gaussian case (the latter is recovered when g is affine), in part because estimators of the type considered may have an asymptotic variance which is random in the limit. Broadly, when g is smooth and nonaffine, three types of limit distributions can arise, types (i), (ii) and (iii), say. Each type can be represented as a random integral. More specifically, type (i) can be represented as the integral of a certain random function with respect to Lebesgue measure; type (ii) can be represented as the integral of a second random function with respect to an independent Gaussian random measure; and type (iii) can be represented as a Wiener-Itô integral of order 2. Which type occurs depends on a combination of the following factors: the roughness of X(t), whether d = 1 or d = 2 and the order of the increment which is used. Another notable feature of our results is that, even though the estimators we consider are based on a variogram, no moment conditions are required on the observed field g{X(t)} for the limit theory to hold. The results of a numerical study are also presented.

Description

Citation

Source

Annals of Statistics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until