Test environment running 7.6.6

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A close look at dihedral angles and melt geometry in olivine-basalt aggregates

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Olivine-basalt aggregates sintered at high P/T have been used as a simplest approximation of partially molten upper mantle peridotite. In the past, geometry of partial melt in polycrystalline olivine (and other materials) has been characterised by dihedral (wetting) angles which depend upon surface free energy. However, since olivine (like most other crystalline materials) is distinctively anisotropic, the simple surface energy balance defining the dihedral angles cos(Θ/2) = γ(gb)/2γ(sl) is not valid and melt geometry is more complicated than can be expressed by a single dihedral angle value. We examine in detail melt geometry in aggregates held at high temperature and pressure for very long times (240-612 h). We show the simple dihedral angle concept to be invalid via transmission electron microscope images. Olivine-basalt interfaces are frequently planar crystal faces (F-faces) which are controlled by the crystal structure rather than the surface area minimisation used in the simple dihedral angle concept. Nevertheless, the dihedral angles may provide useful insights in some situations. They may give a rough estimation of the wetting behaviour of a system, or be used to approximate the melt distribution if F-faces are not present (possibly at large grain size and very low melt fraction). Our measurements, excluding F-faces, give a range of dihedral angle values from 0 to 10°which is significantly lower than reported previously (20-50°). The nature of 0°angles (films and layers up to 1 μm in thickness) is unclear but their frequency compared to dry grain boundaries depends on grain size and melt fraction (e.g. 70% for grain size 43 μm and melt fraction 2%).

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until